Hand out for the articles of the year lecture at EMU 2018
I love evidence based medicine, but I definitely understand the criticism that EBM nerds like myself can come across as very negative. Thrombolytics don’t work. BNP isn’t helpful. Stress testing is a sham. Idarucizumab? Yeah right. I think this scientific criticism is crucial, but I understand that it isn’t always fun. So when I was asked to present my favourite articles of the year at the North York General Emergency Medicine Update, I decided to stay entirely positive. I only chose papers that were potentially practice changing, but more importantly, that could have a positive impact on clinical practice. These are the papers I chose.
Continue reading “Articles of the year (EMU 2018)”
A guide to the initial emergency department management of patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure
A 40 year old female presents by EMS with significant dyspnea. She has had a fever and cough for 2 days, and has been getting progressively more short of breath. Today, she almost fainted when she stood up, so she called 911. Her vital signs are HR 135, BP 88/45, RR 35, and an oxygen saturation of 90% on a nonrebreather. She is quite somnolent. As she is being transferred to the stretcher, the paramedic mentions that she has a pump of some sort to treat her pulmonary hypertension…
Continue reading “Resuscitation of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure”
A rapid review of Dengue fever for emergency medicine clinicians
The Rapid Review series is designed to briefly review the key emergency medicine points from a single clinical review paper.
The Topic: Dengue Fever
Continue reading “Rapid Review: Dengue Fever”
I was invited on EMCrit to discuss my position on idarucizumab and I fear I didn’t do a great job explaining myself. I don’t want to spend more time discussing the specifics of idarucizumab, but I think the larger problem of declaring that a therapy works without study, or declaring that it would be unethical to study a therapy because we “know it works” despite a lack of randomized control trials, is worth pursuing. Continue reading “Most medical practices are not parachutes”
A summary of the evidence comparing IV to oral antibiotics for cellulitis
“I’ve been on these oral antibiotics for 36 hours and my cellulitis isn’t improving. My doctor sent me in because I NEED IV antibiotics.”
“This patient has pretty mild cellulitis, but he does have a fever, so I think we should go with IV antibiotics.”
“That is a pretty big cellulitis. There is no way it is going to improve with just oral antibiotics.”
Among physicians and patients alike, it is generally accepted that IV antibiotics are better than oral. They are stronger. They will work faster. They will save the day when oral antibiotics have failed. But do the bacteria floating around in the soft tissues of your leg really care (or even know) whether the antibiotics entered your system through a vein or via the stomach?
Continue reading “Magical thinking in modern medicine: IV antibiotics for cellulitis”
A monthly (ish) summary of the emergency medicine literature
Every two months or so I write a monthly summary of the most interesting medical literature that I have encountered. This is one of those summaries. Continue reading “Articles of the month (March 2018)”
A review of the BNP literature
In the most recent episode of Emergency Medicine Cases Journal Jam, Rory, Anton, and I cover the evidence for (for against) using BNP in the emergency department. These are my notes. Continue reading “BNP in the emergency department: The evidence”